[[ Free kindle ]] Profit Over People: Neoliberalism & Global OrderAuthor Noam Chomsky – Kairafanan.co

This book, while a bit dated in some respects, like Dr King s Where Do We Go from Here Chaos or Community , is still quite relevant, and full of useful references, as well as a very useful index Chomsky critiques various parts of the structural and policy based problems with our world system, but in general does not offer a comprehensive set of action items that would lead to a solution, nor to a larger vision with specific goals Nevertheless, his book provides needed material on which to build larger solution sets for all of us.Let s EndPoverty , EndHomelessness , EndMoneyBail starting by improving these four parts of our good PublicDomainInfrastructure 4 1 libraries, 2 ProBono legal aid and Education, 3 UniversalHealthCare , and 4 good publictransport Read, Write, Ranked Choice Voting and Housing for ALL , Walk PublicDomainInfrastructure ShiraDest April, 12019 HE If you are looking for a comprehensive theoretical analysis of neoliberalism, check out David Harvey s super readable, A Brief History of Neoliberalism If you just want some of that pure, uncut, 1999 Seattle WTO protest era Chomsky, this is your jam. I am almost embarrassed to say that this was my first introduction to the concept of neoliberalism, and how it is distinct from classical liberalism Classical liberalism focuses on protecting the rights of the individual from government interference, whereas neoliberalism focuses on promoting economic prosperity by giving businesses freedom from regulation in the ultimate hope in theory, at least of the trickle down Noam Chomsky does little to attack neoliberalism as an economic theory in this book I suppose that is not his area of expertise any way, but he sure does succeed in bringing to the reader s attention the hypocrisy of those read government and big business who hark on free market principles while actually insulating big business from the costs and risks of doing business Chomsky further focuses his attention on how neoliberal doctrine dictates the foreign policy of the US and other developed countries That US interference abroad, especially in Latin America and the Caribbean, has little to do with promoting democracy and to do with paving or smoothing the way for US investors by propping up US friendly regimes in these countries is something that most cynics have suspected for a long time Chomsky basically compiles information to confirm these suspicions by citing to hitherto classified or obscure government documents Chomsky does wrap up this book by shifting away from all this doom and gloom to show that there is hope after all The Multilateral Agreement on Investment was a treaty that was under negotiations between countries in secret for years before a draft was leaked to the public and the legislative branches of the countries governments The treaty, if enacted, would have stopped a signatory government from passing regulations that would hamper the functioning of transnational corporations in their country, while opening the country up to law suits from the company This treaty created an uproar amongst labor unions and environmental groups, resulting in its ultimate failure The media and government blamed fringe elements in society for this setback, but Chomsky makes sure to let the reader know that the entities against this treaty were far from being fringe Overall, Chomsky asks his readers to be informed, involved and to constantly question the propaganda machine.This said, why did I give the book only 3 stars Because while the message of the book and the information contained in it deserves attention, the book itself could have been better written First, I was surprised to notice that the book is a collection of articles by Chomsky on the topic resulting in lack of flow and a whole lot of repetition Second, Chomsky s tone is HEAVILY sarcastic While I enjoy sarcasm as much as the next person, I did think that, as a literary tool, it was used pretty heavy handedly I don t usually expect that from my non fiction books, and I thought that it really took away from the importance of his arguments My third quibble with the book is that Chomsky, at first glance, makes it seem like there is a mass conspiracy and collusion between the government and the business entities focused on subjugating the general masses, but it s only the assiduous reader who notices that he doesn t exactly mean that What Chomsky really means to say is that there is a de facto subjugation thanks to the inertia of a system with a focus on profit making by individual companies, political parties all consuming need for campaign support and finance to stay afloat, and a mostly uninvolved public However, he doesn t quite succeed in maintaining this important distinction. Reading Chomsky is informative, eye opening, and disturbing Few writers challenge what you think you know better than he And yet despite the insights, the analysis, the disturbing revelations that are really a matter of public record and knowledge, what comes through is his optimism and belief in the power of collective groups to work to the benefit of all Noam Chomsky is brilliant, insightful, a first class mind, destined to be studied for generations, but he is also first and foremost a good human being, who refuses to lose his humanity, or his faith in human beings The arguments here reveal the agendas in corporations who seek transnational trade agreements but attempt to do so behind closed doors, between heads of state and heads of corporations, without the consent or knowledge of the constituents they supposedly represent The truly disturbing aspect of the book is the collusion between the two groups to effectively rule out the opinion of the masses, whose lives are affected by the deals brokered in glass towers Chomsky warns we must be wary of those in the business who claim to act in our best interest without wanting to inform us of how are lives are to be affected by the deals brokered there. Description In Profit Over People, Noam Chomsky takes on neoliberalism the pro corporate system of economic and political policies presently waging a form of class war worldwide By examining the contradictions between the democratic and market principles proclaimed by those in power and those actually practiced, Chomsky critiques the tyranny of the few that restricts the public arena and enacts policies that vastly increase private wealth, often with complete disregard for social and ecological consequences Combining detailed historical examples and uncompromising criticism, Chomsky offers a profound sense of hope that social activism can reclaim people s rights as citizens rather than as consumers, redefining democracy as a global movement, not a global market Neoliberalism is fascism with the gloves off trickle down economics Instead of citizens, consumers are produced.Fascism and Corporate Capitalism Noam Chomsky I got 50% through this book before deciding that going through the rest would kind of be a waste of time I just wasn t getting anything out of this book, and thought it was kind of junky I ll give it two stars because maybe the second half is really great, and I do think there is value in keeping us aware of bad policy and hypocrisy in our history present.Chomsky seems to follow a format in each piece it s not really a book, but a collection of shorter essays and pieces 1 make a caricature of a certain view claim opinion, throwing in lots of hyperbole 2 pick a bunch of one line quotes from policymakers often from 100 years ago or other authoritative figures an unnamed leading business figure without much context 3 translate for us what there people are REALLY saying, 4 and then jump around through a bunch of sometimes related examples to show that there has been inconsistency, contradiction, or hypocrisy in U.S policy shocking 5 repeatI was actually pretty disappointed, and expected penetrating original analysis Pointing out that there has been hypocrisy, contradictions, and exploitation over the centuries of U.S policy shouldn t surprise anyonebut also doesn t prove anything about current policy proposals debates decisions And I m frankly not sure how much current policymakers really care about what James Madison or John Foster Dulles would think about any current issueviews evolve.The analysis of globalization is also pretty dated, and a lot seems kind of wrong in retrospect For example, he characterises parts of the WTO as just intended to help U.S telecommunications companies take over state run telecommunications firms abroad I m not an expert in this and might be wrongbut ten years later a Japanese telecom is buying Sprint, Deutsche Telekom owns T Mobile, and I m not aware of ATT or Verizon s huge domination of many foreign markets. Chomsky makes some good points, but in his central thesis he misunderstands the free market The argument of this book is that the rhetoric of capitalism and Milton Friedman s neo liberalism have been used by the uber mega corporations to keep themselves in power This is certainly true of the Rush Limbaugh Sean Hanity neo conservative movement I have personally heard Limbaugh shill for the mega corporations on his show, and this constitutes a misunderstanding of the free market and how huge corporations are formed Chomsky falls into the same misunderstanding The free market does not make huge corporations The free market encourages competition between businesses Huge corporations are formed by the government not enforcing its anti trust laws and protecting the corporations from meaningful competition The bigger a corporation gets, the it wants to be shielded from real competition, and the government readily complies That isn t the free market If you want to call it capitalism, go ahead But it isn t the free market and its really like crapitalism Anyway, Chomsky points out a lot of the evil that these huge corporations have done overseas and around the world, and all that I can readily grant The problem is that he blames the free market for the origination of the huge corporations Sorry Noam Not even close on that one. Chomsky has a gift for picking apart convincingly the arguments that others use to support the Global status quo In this book he discusses how free trade really isn t free and how US and Western European policies have helped keep the undeveloped world poor Not for the faint of heart or anyone who voted for Bush. Profit over people has been a rallying cry for some time now Chomsky put this book out in 1998 and it has been revised in 2011 I remember Reagan s deregulation and saving American industry usually with protectionism I was in graduate school in the late 90s and remember the push for globalization The irony there too is I was attended a very liberal university and the international relations program was big on globalization Globalization was seen as open and free trade with each nation producing what it did best The increased efficiency would raise the standard of living for everyone Fear of losing American jobs was offset by cheaper products and a rising standard of living Finally, globalization would bring peace With trade creating dependencies on other nations for products and exports, peace would become the logical result All this sounded fine, in theory, and instructors made a strong case for these ideas Peace, prosperity, and free trade sounded rather ideal There was a problem, however The job exodus, low corporate taxes, government subsidies, and corporate influence over government created the concept of neo liberalism Neo liberalism is meant to inspire thinking of Adam Smith and The Wealth of Nations Instead, it has created a system that has lead to the 1% In 1971, 90% of international financial transactions were in the real economy trade or long term investment By 1995, 95% of the international transactions were speculative only 5% were in the real economy Chomsky places much of the blame on Nixon and the ending of the Brenton Woods System and the regulation and oversight it created Chomsky quite frequently crushes the belief that America spreads democracy and freedom to nations of the world In fact, America has a long history of supporting dictatorships More than a few democratically elected leaders have been overthrown directly or indirectly by the US The reason boils down to US interests Democratically elected leaders generally owe their allegiance to those who elected them Generally this is the poor and lower class in developing countries People want jobs, healthcare, and affordable housing and food Many times this means public ownership of resources oil and minerals It can mean land redistribution, tariffs, and a primarily domestic economy These are threats to Ameican Interests American business wants foreign ownership of natural resources and foreign investment control of industry Large plantation owners are stable than small peasant farms United States offered to help governments open themselves to foreign investment and ownership In Latin America, the United States offered governments protection of their borders This allowed military spending inside countries to be concentrated on internal security Increased Internal security allowed governments to hold power and keep the population under control Stability and open markets were America s interests In the long run, all this has done is to increase the concentration of wealth into the hands of the few America s freedom is something of an illusion we hold to We established ourselves as a free country, but only white, land owning males had a say in the government John Jay said that those who own the country should have the voice Madison later would follow up by stating if everyone can vote, it would harm the land owners, eventually leading to land redistribution violating the key right of property America considered a race of people to be only 2 3s a person Women were not given the right to vote until the 20th Century The original inhabitants had to wait until 1924 before they became citizens in the land of their ancestors For such a small publication Chomsky covers a great deal of territory and I have only touched on a few items Our world is not what we see it to be People are too willing to believe and turn that belief to blame How could the World Court try and bring charges against the US for mining Nicaragua s harbors How can the UN not agree with the United States How can countries not allow foreign ownership of their property The question should simply be Why can t people see what is really going on. In Profit Over People, Noam Chomsky Takes On Neoliberalism The Pro Corporate System Of Economic And Political Policies Presently Waging A Form Of Class War Worldwide By Examining The Contradictions Between The Democratic And Market Principles Proclaimed By Those In Power And Those Actually Practiced, Chomsky Critiques The Tyranny Of The Few That Restricts The Public Arena And Enacts Policies That Vastly Increase Private Wealth, Often With Complete Disregard For Social And Ecological Consequences Combining Detailed Historical Examples And Uncompromising Criticism, Chomsky Offers A Profound Sense Of Hope That Social Activism Can Reclaim People S Rights As Citizens Rather Than As Consumers, Redefining Democracy As A Global Movement, Not A Global Market